Chapter 3
Up Chapter 1 Chapter 2 Chapter 3 Chapter 4 Chapter 5 Chapter 6 Chapter 7 Chapter 8 Chapter 9 Chapter 10 Chapter 11 Chapter 12 Chapter 13 Chapter 14 Chapter 15 Chapter 16

 

Chapter 3 :
The Super Labs
vs. the Primordial Organic Soup
wpe6.jpg (12430 bytes)

wpe10.jpg (11939 bytes)

 

There is a hypothetical challenge that I would like you to consider. It is a challenge between two sides that I have named the Super Labs and the Primordial Soup. They are to be set against each other in a competition. It is a important challenge because it pits all the cumulative intelligence and scientific horsepower harnessed by human beings against the awesome powers of nature. The challenge - create any living organism from scratch. The definition of ‘scratch’ is quite plain and simple. The challenging sides may use any components or organic chemicals as long as there is absolutely no life in any of the raw ingredients.

Before we get too far into the details of this challenge and try to establish which side is successful and why, we need to first consider the starting points and strengths of the members involved in the competition. Let us begin with nature’s side, Primordial Organic Soup, as it is sometimes referred to. What is a good description of the strengths, conditions, content and early settings for the primordial soup?

To find descriptions of primordial conditions and some theories on how life may have originated, I sought out two references. One reference is quite old, from the 1960’s, and comes from the biology textbook that I used in high school. The particular reference that was found is a short and succinct description. The text is quoted completely, as follows:

The Origin and the History of Life

Several billion years ago, when the earth was vastly different from what it is today, the primeval seas became rich mixtures of organic molecules. Probably a chance combination of molecules produced a larger molecule (similar to the DNA of today?) that had a chemical structure giving it a pattern for exact duplication. Slowly, the duplicating molecules became parts of more complex systems, until - perhaps after one or two billion years - they could be called "organisms." From these humble beginnings life spread over the earth and evolved into its innumerable species - each an experiment in living in a particular way.

Biological Science - An Inquiry into Life. © 1963 by the American Institute of Biological Sciences.  Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.

 

The complete chapter entitled "The Origin and the History of Life", which is part of the textbook, goes into substantially more detail and elaborates on the previous reference. To be completely fair though, I felt that instead of describing the theories of primordial soup and the early life it yielded from the vantage of this textbook, a second modern reference should be found to ensure better credibility and provide a more current state on the scientific theories about the origins of life.

However, before I leave that older textbook, the chapter also included a photograph of the laboratory apparatus for a famous experiment. In May 1953, Stanley Miller published his paper called "A Production of Amino Acids Under Possible Primitive Earth Conditions." The picture shows the actual laboratory equipment used in the experiment that demonstrated amino acid synthesis in a simulated primitive atmosphere. While this has been a digression, we have started to build a picture, albeit somewhat dated, of our challenging team: the Super Labs.

For some, this may seem to be pretty intellectual material. What is an amino acid? Do not worry about some of these concepts or details at this point. Later, there is a chapter on biology that goes into a few of these subjects and gives some plain and straightforward explanations. The chapter on biology also takes a look at this area of science from a totally different viewpoint. For now, the present intent is to deal with the subject matter on a higher level to gain the big picture, so to say. Are we going to get pulled into a vortex of complicated biological terms? The answer to this question is not for very long.

The second more modern reference that follows may get slightly cerebral, but I would not be overly concerned about it. Unless you are well versed in such material, please just read it patiently and slowly to obtain the best grasp and understanding of the material. Then we will come back out of the vortex, to the higher ground and examine the big picture. The following text is a direct quote from a computer based encyclopedia available on a compact disk.

Origin of Life and Evolution of Cells

Scientists have formulated many theories about the origin of life and how it evolved into the various forms known today. These ideas are deduced from the evidence of the fossil record, from laboratory simulations of conditions on the primeval earth, and from consideration of the structure and function of cells.

The earth was created more than 3 billion years ago, although more than 2 billion years probably passed before life as it is now known developed. Scientists believe that the atmosphere of the young earth was mostly water vapor, methane, and ammonia, with very little gaseous oxygen. Laboratory simulations have shown that all major classes of organic molecules could have been generated from this atmosphere by the energy of the sun or by lightning and that the lack of oxygen would prevent newly formed organic molecules from being broken down by oxidation. Rain would have carried these molecules into lakes and oceans to form a primordial soup.

When the concentration of organic molecules in this soup became high enough, molecules would have begun to form stable aggregates. For example, lipids might coalesce into droplets the way cooking oil does in water, thus generating simple membranes and trapping other organic molecules in the interior of the droplet. Randomly formed aggregations that could harness energy to grow and reproduce themselves would eventually far outnumber other combinations. DNA may have been an essential component of the self-reproducing aggregates; it and RNA are the only organic molecules able to duplicate themselves. These supramolecular aggregations would have been extremely lifelike and with some refinements would have resembled primitive prokaryotes. This concept of the origin of life, however, does not explain the development of the genetic code and the precise interdependence between the code and protein synthesis.

The relative absence of oxygen from the atmosphere of the young earth meant that no ozone layer existed to screen out ultraviolet radiation and no oxygen was available for aerobic respiration. Therefore, the first cells were probably photosynthetic and used ultraviolet light. Because photosynthesis generates oxygen, the oxygen content of the atmosphere gradually increased. As a result, cells that could use this oxygen to generate energy, and photosynthetic cells that could use light other than ultraviolet, eventually became predominant.

Eukaryotes may have evolved from prokaryotes. This idea comes from speculation about the origin of mitochondria and chloroplasts. These organelles may be the degenerate descendants of aerobic and photosynthetic prokaryotes that were engulfed by larger prokaryotes but remained alive within them (endosymbiosis). Over the years the host cell became dependent on the endosymbionts for energy (ATP), while they in turn became dependent on the host for most other cell functions. The fact that mitochondria and chloroplasts are surrounded by two membranes, as if they had originally entered the cell by phagocytosis, supports this theory. In addition, these organelles contain their own DNA and ribosomes, which resemble the DNA and ribosomes of bacteria more than those of eukaryotes. It is possible that other eukaryotic organelles originated similarly.

"Cell," Microsoft® Encarta® 97 Encyclopedia. © 1993-1996 Microsoft Corporation.

 

Well, if you managed to get to this point and are still reading, you have survived the most complex and technical portion of this chapter. Both of the foregoing descriptions, being direct quotations, have done a reasonable job of describing one of the challenging teams - the team which I refer to as the Primordial Organic Soup. Next, we will move on to describe the other team that I refer to as the Super Labs.

Unfortunately, I was not able to find suitable reference material that could be quoted to you and which would paint a picture of the Super Labs. So, it will be necessary to construct the image for you, step by step. The effort of describing these labs began upon the mention of the photograph and apparatus used by Miller to synthesize amino acids. However, we need to describe the challenging team far more adequately than that.

To understand the technical sophistication and resources available to the Super Labs, let us start with the biological, life sciences, and medical research labs first. We have all likely seen these sophisticated labs either first hand through our own learning experience, through tours of facilities, or via the various media that is presented to us in terms of documentaries or news reports. You need to visualize the resources available to a well equipped lab. Resources might range from: a wide spectrum of supplies; organic and non-organic chemicals; high tech lab equipment for monitoring, controlling and analyzing experiments; and, right up to specially designed buildings and labs for controlling biological environments. The list of equipment would be almost endless and probably would be contained in other smaller labs that specialize in the various sub-fields of analysis or biology. There would be all types of specialized and costly equipment including: light microscopes, electrophoresis equipment, baths and circulators, incubators, pH equipment, fume hoods, and scanning electron microscopes - to name a few.

Biology is not the only science needed. Chemistry and biochemistry labs are just as specialized and just as technical. Who has not seen chemistry labs with all the elaborate glassware, chemical processes, heat sources, vacuum sources, cooling mechanisms and wide arrays of chemicals in liquid, powder and all forms imaginable? They are also equipped with sophisticated equipment for monitoring, controlling, and analyzing chemical and biochemical reactions. Items like centrifuges, gas and liquid chromatograph equipment, and mass spectrometers are available to determine the makeup of chemical, organic, and biological materials.

Sciences such as physics should not be ignored. This science has equally advanced apparatus such as particle accelerators, cyclotrons, and collider accelerators to study the physics of atoms. Some of these structures occupy spaces bigger than football fields. While biology may not require these labs to provide such a detail level of analysis, physics offers all types of radiation sources that include: high voltage electricity to simulate lightning, visible light sources, lasers, microwave, infrared, ultraviolet light sources, X rays, and gamma rays. Physics can also provide electrical and electronic analysis equipment, high pressures, low pressures, vacuums, temperatures, and different gas atmospheres. Who has not seen pictures of a complex physics lab that looks like a plumber’s dream of exotic metals, pipes, sensors, gauges, wires, and banks of electronic instrumentation? (They might even keep an engineer handy to fix things.)

If you combine all of these visual elements in your mind, you start to get a sense of the technical horsepower that exists in the world today. However, something that is vital and extremely important from the description of the Super Lab team is missing - people.

.....................(excerpt only - continues)

© 1998
Peter Soszek

Go to Chapter 4 :   Science and Engineers: What's the Matter with Engineers Anyway?  -   

http://www.mts.net/~pekored/chapter4.htm